Soysoap Meag Soil Consultancy - Australia
PO Box 131 , Northam, WA, Australia
Phone: 0896212770, Mobile Phone: 0427770317, Fax: 0896212771
Email: meag@westnet.com.au
Soysoap Stripe Rust Wheat Trial Rated #1 - Colin Steddy - (Rust Counts)
Treatment
Row
Stripe Rust %
Average
Ranking
Control
S6
6
Control
S21
7
Control
S30
6
6.3333%
4
Prot Plus
S9
10
Prot Plus
S24
3
Prot Plus
S27
1
4.6666%
2
Soysoap
S12
3
Soysoap
S15
5
Soysoap
S33
4
4.0000%
1
KSoff
S3
5
KSoff
S18
4
KSoff
S36
6
5.0000%
3
The counts were done to the best of my knowledge, and I calculated the percentage of the flag leaves that were infected by rust spores.
These tests were conducted by one who has over 40 years of commercial farming experience. He is a certified SFI (Soil Foodweb Institute) Advisor and internationally recognized authority in agricultural sciences.
Lets get serious about farming with Soysoap, Dont plant seeds until you understand this!
The Foundation of good crop production and lifecycle cost management is high Brix Levels, Increased Carbon Dioxide Consumption and Electrical Conductivity (EC )(Microsiemens). After that,
You should know how your going to increase (Microsiemens) in Soils, Chemicals, Fertilizers and Plants. Your consultant needs to be an expert in "Increasing Carbon Dioxide Consumption",
Plant Pathology, Entomology, Electrical Conductivity (EC) (Microsiemens) and Soil Science! When your consultant comes to your farm I would start by asking him! "How are
you going to increase my (Microsiemens), Plant Brix, Carbon Dioxide Consumption! And than, Ask his help with immobilized nutrient trans-location.
Treatment
Row
Brix
Sap PH
Sap EC (mS/cd)
Chlorophyll
Control
S6
10.2
5.5
11.4
39
Control
S21
9.5
5.4
11.0
41
Control
S30
9.0
5.6
10.5
40
Protein Plus
S9
11.6
5.7
12.5
41
Protein Plus
S24
10.5
6.0
11.9
45
Protein Plus
S27
12.5
5.8
13.0
41
KSoff
S3
12.8
5.9
14.2
43
KSoff
S18
11.6
5.8
12.0
42
KSoff
S36
12.4
6.1
11.3
42
Soysoap
S12
11.2
5.8
13.2
41
Soysoap
S15
13.5
5.8
12.8
42
Soysoap
S33
13.8
5.9
12.4
42
The SFI test are the facts that Soysoap is "Clear Winner" in raising Brix/Sugar levels, Increasing Carbon Dioxide Consumption and
Electrical Conductivity (EC)(Microsiemens). Soysoap topped all tested products with an average of 12.8 Brix and that is
33% higher than the control. This highlights how the products works at about the atom level and can work with all plants living cells as they electromagnetic
(Electric). To work atomically you cant use picotechnology (obsoletes Nanotechnology & Graphene) it is to big, you need an about atom size particle.
SFI said Sap EC (mS/cd) average was increased by 17% or 1.9 (mS/cd) Electrical Conductivity (Microsiemens) vs control. SFI proclaimed that Soysoap helps
increase Carbon Dioxide consumption by 33% over the control, i.e., more money to the farmer. Now you need to deal with
your soils remediation for chelated immobilized fertilizers and other nutrients which we can help you with before you plant!
The Competition did well: KSoff 2nd 12.25 Brix, Protein Plus 3rd 11.5 Brix, and Control 9.5 Brix.
These tests and their expert opinion were certified SFI (Soil Foodweb Institute),And Meag Consultancy, Colin Steddy, Australian, Wheat Trail: Brix,
Sap PH, Sap EC(mS/cd) Electrical Conductivity (Microsiemens), Chlorophyll, On 26 September about 15:15 - 16.20 at
Temp:72 F, Sunshine.
Six hectares of wheat fields was sprayed with Adjuvant 1-500 at the rate of 1 litre to 500 litres of water. The trial calls for 6 replicates of each treatment, so a total of 36 hectares is involved.
Adjuvant 1-500 was compared to other foliar sprays, including 1.5 litres of K.SiOff, a potassium silicate solution, and 3 foliar spray combinations, at 12.66 litres per ha, which made up the Full/House application. Four days later, at midday, brix readings showed the following results:
Adjuvant 1-500 recorded the 2 highest readings and averaged .6 Brix higher than the Full/House which was applied at the rate of 12.66 litres per hectare at a cost of $44.20 compared with Wheat the Adjuvant cost of $7.50 per hectare.
This was the first reading taken on the trial, which is monitoring Brix levels, disease suppression, insect pressure, yield and grain quality including protein levels. GPS yield mapping at harvest time, as well as weigh bin trailers, will accurately measure grain yields. Results will be finalized by the end of 2006.
These tests are being conducted by a certified SFI (Soil Foodweb Institute) Advisor and internationally recognized authority in agricultural sciences. He has over 40 years of commercial farming experience.
To determine the beneficial effects which might arise from applying Adjuvant to a nectarine orchard, in which gummosis, a bacterial infection was noticed in the orchard affecting a large number of trees.
Procedure
A 10 hectare nectarine orchard offered to conduct a one hectare trial on trees affected by gummosis, using Adjuvant . The disease was manifested by a general Xanthomonas oozing from the limbs of the trees. The first application was sprayed at the rate of 1 litre of Adjuvant diluted in 500 litres of water per hectare.
Observations
After the first spray the Gummosis has ceased to ooze from the limbs of the trees, and the farmer believes that the diseased trees are in remission. He has made arrangements to spray the rest of the orchard with Adjuvant . Spraying will be ongoing monthly to the 1 trial hectare and will measure the following parameters: Brix levels, disease suppression, pest pressure, fruit maturation time, pack house quality and size percentages, as well as overall yield.
These tests were supervised and conducted by a certified SFI (Soil Foodweb Institute) Advisor and internationally recognized authority in agricultural sciences. He has over 40 years of commercial farming experience.
WESTERN AUSTRALIA REPORT 2
Orchard: Raeburn Orchard, Dwellingup W. Australia
Problem: Bacterial Spot Xanthomonas
Description: 2005 - 2006 Season 30% of the crop was lost to Bacterial Spot, Copper and Bordeaux sprays had little effect.
2006-2006 A Spray of Adjuvant 1-500 was applied to Nectarines at early bud burst at 1 to 500 on Sept 5 th. Of the eight rows of nectarines the top two rows and bottom two were sprayed.
Inspection: An inspection of this trail was completed on Oct 3 rd , 2006.
Method: Results as follows, a number of individual trees were inspected using a pregenerated list of random numbers. A count was done of the number of dead fruiting wood branches on each tree. Two treated and two untreated rows were inspected and the count noted.
Tree #
Treated Row 1
Treated Row 2
Control Row 3
Control Row 4
3
0
0
2
0
5
0
0
1
2
8
0
5
2
12
13
0
0
1
13
17
1
0
5
6
19
1
0
9
11
24
0
0
2
13
30
0
0
9
20
34
0
0
7
5
36
0
0
5
11
Total
2
5
43
93
Treated Rows 1 & 2 - 20 trees Treated 7 Dead Branches or Average 0.35% Average Per Tree
Untreated Rows 3 & 4 20 trees Control 136 Dead Branches or Average 6.80 Average Per Tree
ObservationsThe above picture is a sample of the control tree; notice the bunching of the leaves and the
dead fruiting branches with no flowering taking place. From the above results the interesting statistic is that only 3 trees in 20 [ 15% ] in the treated
rows had dead fruiting branches as compared to 19 of the 20 in the control [95%]. This represents a difference of 80% between the treated and the control.
This will represent a huge difference when the crop is harvested.
Observations:
There are no dead fruiting branches on this treated tree with very good leaf coverage and good flowering taking place compared to the control tree.
Comment:
The grower is very pleased with the result and will be spraying the entire orchard.
These tests were supervised and conducted by a certified SFI (Soil Foodweb Institute) Advisor and internationally recognized authority in agricultural
sciences. He has over 40 years of commercial farming experience.
This effort was on of the most rewarding of 2006. I had heard of the man that had Gummosis oozing Xanthomonas bacterial on his 8 hectares of trees and was warming
up a chain saw to cutdown 8 hectares of his nectarine orchard. Lucky for us and him that he allowed the plant tonic to be sprayed as mentioned above. Than he has
put away his chain saw and is harvesting has nectarines! Thanks J A Franklin, 2 Kilarney Heights, Kallaroo, Perth, WA 6025, AUSTRALIA!
Greenhouse Plantings In Australia
Lettuce Parts Adjuvant Control Advantage Whole Plant WT 2.437g 2.158g Adjuvant 12% more Tops Only 1.776g 1.537g Adjuvant 15% more Roots Only 2.400g 2.126g Adjuvant 13% more Roots Dry .72g .69g Adjuvant 04% more Leaf Length 6.74cm 6.54cm Adjuvant 03% more Brix Readings 3.8 3.0 Adjuvant 21% more
Nature and Purpose of the Test To determine the effect of Adjuvant upon lettuce seedlings being grown in a greenhouse environment. Entire seedlings, as well as various parts of the lettuce plants, will be weighed for size comparison and brix readings will be taken to determine if there is any increase in sugar content.
Procedure Seeds were dipped in Adjuvant for two to four hours prior to being planted and were then sprayed periodically during the first month following germination.
Observations After just four weeks from being planted, the tiny lettuce plants, as well as the tops and roots sprayed with Adjuvant , showed an increase in weight of 12% to 15%. The brix sugar content readings measured 21% more. Both of these indicated a remarkable rate of growth for such a short period of time. The lower cost of treating the original potting mix with Adjuvant saved the nursery $5.00 for every cubic meter of potting mix. In addition, none of the seedlings was subject to the usual exposure of harsh and expensive petrochemicals and fungicides.
These tests were conducted by a certified SFI (Soil Foodweb Institute) Advisor and internationally recognized authority in agricultural sciences. He has over 40 years of commercial farming experience.
Alomst 300% Increase from 12 to 35 in Brix Level on Macadamia.
Nature and Purpose of the Test To determine the effect of Adjuvant upon various varieties of Macadamia seedlings in the measurement of their Brix content.
Procedure Adjuvant was sprayed onto various macademia seedlings at the rate of 1 litre diluted with 500 litres of water.
Adjuvant was applied on August 10, 2006 and re-applied on the 23 rd of August, with the following results: Dates Brix readings taken:
Product
10 Aug 2006
15 Aug
17 Aug
19 Aug
23 Aug
29 Aug
Adjuvant
12
24
20
18
22
20
Control
12
13
20
14
22
18
Adjuvant
24
23
17
12
24
13
Control
24
19
16
12
17
12
Soysoap
22
35
34
30
30
32
Control
22
26
28
19
26
24
Observations :
Brix levels seem to rise fairly rapidly [in one case by 100%] and then overtime gradually decrease back to the original starting Brix level.
A fourteen day interval seems to be a good starting point for maintaining Brix levels. The above data also represents different varieties of Macadamia trees,
as the brix level in the last variety Soysoap increased to 35 Brix an exceptionally high figure.
These tests were conducted by a certified SFI (Soil Foodweb Institute) Advisor and internationally recognized authority in
agricultural sciences. He has over 40 years of commercial farming experience.
