Biobased USA, 805 Cottage Hill Way, Brandon, FL 33511
800 995-9203, 336 306-0193, Email: email@example.com Emails can go to spam, Please call me, We are available 7 days week EST 10AM to 10PM!
Introduction “Agri-Physics”! Physical Chemistry was discontined about 1920's as much as possible by Agri-Chem because they wanted simply this a patented product. I have never lost yield trail with
physical chemistry “Agri-Physics” vs organic chemistry for crop yield production, soil remediation, crop production. You might hear a very little from Ag Magazines (Why because Agri-Chem spends monthly buy $10,000 to $40,000 on Ads
and the magazines can't afford to lose that revenue about innovative technology),
Universities (They Agri-Chem Funds State Ag Colleges Period, When you control a state ag Colleges you can control the states farmers purchases!),
Crop Associations, Ext Agents (Ext Agents from Ag Colleges are given a script for farmer precentation for
each county and are not allowed to vary from it by the lead professor of each crop), Crop Consultants (CCA, Some good independents ones out there),
Why to most are dependent on Agri-Chem! Lets talk about fertilizers and anhydrous ammonia's and why we use so much. Its not because we always need it,
its because its so cheap that its used as insurance against loses and the industry had to drum up some nonsense about how much we need. Basic NPK's is
at best a 5% gross profit business. So business went to the universities and got a bunch of professors and
Naughty Scientist soil scientists and told them they need to
sell more lbs. per acre, and they obliged with some scientific proof. The reason we need fertilizers and anhydrous ammonia's after soil tests is that
the fertilizers and anhydrous ammonia's sink into the soil beyond the capability of the plants or bacteria or fungi (via a symbiotic relationship) to
deliver fertilizers and ammonia's to the plant. Maybe it's used to early, maybe the Nitrogen needs to be applied early and late, but its not for the
reason you are being told, as it's all about making more money for the fertilizers industry. Imagine what you could do with $200 to $400 more per acre
back in your pocket. You won't have to grow 100 more bushels of corn or 40 more bushels of beans just to pay for fertilizers/anhydrous. The math is
simple, a 1000 acre farmer could make $200,000 to $400,000 more per year if the actual needs were calculated. The year after unused fertilizers are
applied they are probably 6 to 8 feet below the plant you are growing! There are 3 million farmers in the USA and I only want 3000, Let Agri-Chem
service the rest! I find the dealers and universities have little knowledge on physical chemistry and dont understand “Agri-Physics” can't explain
he benefits for agri-chem doesn't understand it so I have very very few as that were educated in organic chemistry, and arent effective in selling
product even though we win yield and protection contests we enter! Farmers to make money need a CLEAN BREAK from the ways of the past as they are
going broke. There are 3 million farmers in the USA and I only want 3000, Let Agri-Chem service the rest with toxic solutions!
Repeated Use of Glysosate has tied up the fertilizers up to 80% making them unavailable to the plant for production violating
Liebig's Law Of The Minimum and total waste of money for the farmer!
Ex-Monsanto Jerry Pritchard pro-clams, You have discovered the "Missing Link" that we have been searching for for 40 years,
of Agriculture Trans-location. Soysoap helps plant nutrient availabilty by facturing and mobilization of tied up plant nutrient!
Don- 2006 Very impressive. Awhile back when I did analysis on your product you sent me I remember my comment
was "it very definitely resembled soap!" Results look good. Mechanism for increased production would appear to be soap
ingredients act as a vehicle for plant nutrient entry and assimilation. Thanks for information. Good Luck on your
Biobased Products. John Noakes, Ph.D., Director, Center for Applied Isotope Studies, The University of Georgia, and Athens,
2009 Than we got comments from Ex-Monsanto Jerry Pritchard who helped start Monsanto back in the 60's. He made
the comments in the following attachment published in Progressive Farmer back in 2010, "You have discovered the "Missing
Link" of Agriculture Trans-location. I was baffled by the comment and it took me about 5 years to understand that comment.
2010 We also got the same kinds of comments from Tom Harris when he theorized that we were getting nutrients into
the plants through what he called the back door. There has to be a simple explanation why in leaves analysis we get more
nutrients into leaves.
2014 Because of the mobilization of the tied up nutrients we have had some farmers report to us that soil tests
before and after Burndown with the Soysoap. There soil test showed they need PK, but after showed they didn't need any fertilizers as so much of the PK had been made mobilized to increase their amounts.
Here are some opinions of what might just be happening!
1). Dr. 1 Yesterday I went over to see to discuss the apparent "fracturing" of certain micronutrients in soils
when successively higher concentrations
of the soap are added before a soil test. Bert says that somehow, the product must be releasing metal ions from their
Dr. 2 I showed him the four andrean soil analyses from SGS Europe. He immediately asked, "What's breaking the
micros loose? Very, very interesting!
Yup, and your calcium is going down. That has to happen if you free up these other elements. You gotta add calcium."
3). Dr. 3 One possible protocol for determining effect of Soysoap 1 on trace elements in water at near-normal
field rates. Hypothesis: SoySoap blended
in a water solution with chelated trace elements increases availability of those traces to crops when foliar-applied
The SGS Report shows we increased the the Fe 1500%, Mn 800% and Zn 3900%. The product seems to be
fracturing elements to
increased the soilability and has remediated the soils from chemical Glyphosate chelation.
Soysoap Applied in 2009 but not in 2010, Remediated Soils making more fertilizer available in Subsequent year that had been tied up!
Soysoap Tops the Field for Increased Brix Levels, Electrical Conductivity (EC )(Microsiemens)
and "Carbon Dioxide Consumption"
Lets get serious about farming, Dont plant seeds until you understand this!
The Foundation of good crop production and lifecycle cost management is high Brix Levels, Increased Carbon Dioxide Consumption and Electrical Conductivity (EC )(Microsiemens). After that,
You should know how your going to increase (Microsiemens) in Soils, Chemicals, Fertilizers and Plants. Your consultant needs to be an expert in "Increasing Carbon Dioxide Consumption",
Plant Pathology, Entomology, Electrical Conductivity (EC) (Microsiemens) and Soil Science! When your consultant comes to your farm I would start by asking him! "How are
you going to increase my (Microsiemens), Plant Brix, Carbon Dioxide Consumption! And than, Ask his help with immobilized nutrient trans-location.
Sap EC (mS/cd)
The SFI test are the facts that Soysoap is "Clear Winner" in raising Brix/Sugar levels, Increasing Carbon Dioxide Consumption and
Electrical Conductivity (EC)(Microsiemens). Soysoap topped all tested products with an average of 12.8 Brix and that is
33% higher than the control. This highlights how the products works at about the atom level and can work with all plants living cells as they electromagnetic
(Electric). To work atomically you cant use picotechnology (obsoletes Nanotechnology & Graphene) it is to big, you need an about atom size particle.
SFI said Sap EC (mS/cd) average was increased by 17% or 1.9 (mS/cd) Electrical Conductivity (Microsiemens) vs control. SFI proclaimed that Soysoap helps
increase Carbon Dioxide consumption by 33% over the control, i.e., more money to the farmer. Now you need to deal with
your soils remediation for chelated immobilized fertilizers and other nutrients which we can help you with before you plant!
The Competition did well: KSoff 2nd 12.25 Brix, Protein Plus 3rd 11.5 Brix, and Control 9.5 Brix.
These tests and their expert opinion were certified SFI (Soil Foodweb Institute),And Meag Consultancy, Colin Steddy, Australian, Wheat Trail: Brix,
Sap PH, Sap EC(mS/cd) Electrical Conductivity (Microsiemens), Chlorophyll, On 26 September about 15:15 - 16.20 at
Temp:72 F, Sunshine.
How long is the life span of an atom?
Let's take carbon as an example. The most common (and stable) form has 6 neutrons. This is called "carbon-12" from the fact
that there are 6 protons plus 6 neutrons. However one usually works with many,
many atoms, and, in that case, one can use a very reliable average time called the"half-life." This is the time that it takes for half (50%)
of a bunch of unstable atoms to decay. For carbon-14, this number is 5,730 years, or even millions of years.
But, in all these cases, the point of the decay is to reach a type of atom that is stable.
Biobased USA 805 Cottage Hill Way, Brandon, FL 33511 800 995-9203 INTL 336 306-0193